<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NetCompetition &#187; Conflict of Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netcompetitionblog.org/category/conflict-of-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='netcompetitionblog.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://netcompetitionblog.org/osd.xml" title="NetCompetition" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://netcompetitionblog.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Does FCC Want to Become The Federal Video Programming Commission?</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/21/does-fcc-want-to-become-the-federal-video-programming-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/21/does-fcc-want-to-become-the-federal-video-programming-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week an FCC Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ordered Comcast to carry The Tennis Channel in the same tier and channel neighborhood as The Golf Channel and Versus, another sports channel. Given the deep flaws in the ALJ&#8217;s highly-intrusive, and micro-managing decision, there are several good reasons the FCC should overturn the ALJ&#8217;s decision upon [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1554&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/21/does-fcc-want-to-become-the-federal-video-programming-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Android’s Pickpocket Behind Google Wallet</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/09/androids-pickpocket-behind-google-wallet/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/09/androids-pickpocket-behind-google-wallet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The kerfuffle that paints the Google Wallet App as an innocent victim of Verizon blocking &#8212; in violation of an &#8220;open&#8221; Internet and net neutrality regulations &#8212; completely misses the forest for the trees. This conflict revolves around two ongoing industry battles. To see what this kerfuffle is really all about, read my Forbes Tech [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1538&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/09/androids-pickpocket-behind-google-wallet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand Theft Auto-mated! Online Ad-Economics Fuel Piracy &amp; SOPA Opposition</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/11/30/grand-theft-auto-mated-online-ad-economics-fuel-piracy-sopa-opposition/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/11/30/grand-theft-auto-mated-online-ad-economics-fuel-piracy-sopa-opposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The likely passage of online anti-piracy legislation (SOPA/PIPA) in 2012 has put a spotlight on the substantial ad-based business interests aligned with piracy and against piracy enforcement. See my Forbes Tech Capitalist post to learn why Grand Theft Auto-mated is such big business and so anti-piracy enforcement. &#160; Filed under: Conflict of Interest, Congress, Copyright, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1520&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/11/30/grand-theft-auto-mated-online-ad-economics-fuel-piracy-sopa-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Anti-Piracy Legislation Will Become Law</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/11/02/why-anti-piracy-legislation-will-become-law/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/11/02/why-anti-piracy-legislation-will-become-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pending anti-piracy legislation (Senate: PROTECT IP, House: SOPA) is very likely to become law in 2012. See my Forbes Tech Capitalist post to learn why, and why it&#8217;s important. Filed under: Conflict of Interest, Congress, Copyright, FCC, Fraud, Freedom of Speech, FTC, Innovation, Intellectual Property, Net Neutrality, Open Internet, Piracy Tagged: Conflict of Interest, Congress, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1500&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/11/02/why-anti-piracy-legislation-will-become-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google 21st Century Robber Baron</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/19/google-21st-century-robber-baron/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/19/google-21st-century-robber-baron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See my Forbes post &#8220;Google 21st Century Robber Baron&#8221; which briefly tells the story of Google&#8217;s Robber Baron rap sheet, in advance of Google&#8217;s Wednesday Senate antitrust hearing. The post is documented with 79 links to the supporting evidence. The post also explains why Google&#8217;s Board of Directors have been AWOL while all this scofflaw [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1448&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/19/google-21st-century-robber-baron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satirical Preview of Google&#8217;s Senate Antitrust Testimony &#8212; Google&#8217;s Pinocchio Defense Part X</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/13/satirical-preview-of-googles-senate-antitrust-testimony-googles-pinocchio-defense-part-x/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/13/satirical-preview-of-googles-senate-antitrust-testimony-googles-pinocchio-defense-part-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member, it is a real pleasure to be here today, and thank you again for not issuing that formal subpoena you had to threaten in order to compel us to testify. Let me begin my testimony by taking this opportunity to divert the media’s attention from this hearing by making a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1435&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/13/satirical-preview-of-googles-senate-antitrust-testimony-googles-pinocchio-defense-part-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix&#8217; Glass House Temper Tantrum over Broadband Usage Fees</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/07/26/netflix-glass-house-temper-tantrum-over-broadband-usage-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/07/26/netflix-glass-house-temper-tantrum-over-broadband-usage-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 16:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Netflix continues to throw stones at the common economic practice of usage-based pricing, to which broadband carriers are naturally migrating, all while Netflix stands inside a glass house filled with mis-managed usage pricing practices. Netflix as Stone Thrower: In a concerted campaign for net neutrality regulation that would ban broadband usage caps or pricing, Netflix has [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1111&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/07/26/netflix-glass-house-temper-tantrum-over-broadband-usage-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>FreePress McChesney&#8217;s Latest Collectivist Manifesto &#8212; Radical Fringe Series Part I</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/23/freepress-mcchesneys-latest-collectivist-manifesto-radical-fringe-series-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/23/freepress-mcchesneys-latest-collectivist-manifesto-radical-fringe-series-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FreePress co-founder and collectivist ideologue, Robert McChesney, wrote his latest Internet manifesto: &#8220;The Internet&#8217;s Unholy Marriage to Capitalism,&#8221; in the Monthly Review &#8211; An Independent Socialist Magazine.&#8221; McChesney&#8217;s collectivist and elitist manifesto warrants attention because it is widely disseminated to: McChesney&#8217;s existing extensive FreePress spawn network: Save The Internet and dozens of local media reform organizations [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1088&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/23/freepress-mcchesneys-latest-collectivist-manifesto-radical-fringe-series-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Rogue WiSpy Invasive Behavior Proliferates &#8212; Security is Google&#8217;s Achilles Heel &#8212; Part XIII</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/17/googles-rogue-wispy-invasive-behavior-proliferates-security-is-googles-achilles-heel-part-xiii/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/17/googles-rogue-wispy-invasive-behavior-proliferates-security-is-googles-achilles-heel-part-xiii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evidence continues to mount that Google&#8217;s management and supervision of its Android operating system is out-of-control when it comes to protecting privacy and security. Google&#8217;s corporate ethos that it is better to &#8220;ask for forgiveness than permission&#8221; increasingly means Android has no privacy by design and hence less security for users by default. Requiring and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1083&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/17/googles-rogue-wispy-invasive-behavior-proliferates-security-is-googles-achilles-heel-part-xiii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Reasons Google Has Culpability in Gmail Security Breach &#8212; Security is Google Achilles Heel Part XII</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/03/top-10-reasons-google-has-culpability-in-gmail-security-breach-security-is-google-achilles-heel-part-xii/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/03/top-10-reasons-google-has-culpability-in-gmail-security-breach-security-is-google-achilles-heel-part-xii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s deep aversion to accountability was in full view in its blog response to the latest gmail security breach, in which Google placed most all of the blame on users and others, while largely trying to absolve Google of its responsibility and accountability in the matter as the world&#8217;s largest source of private, sensitive and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1070&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/03/top-10-reasons-google-has-culpability-in-gmail-security-breach-security-is-google-achilles-heel-part-xii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
