<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NetCompetition &#187; Antitrust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netcompetitionblog.org/category/antitrust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='netcompetitionblog.org' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://netcompetitionblog.org/osd.xml" title="NetCompetition" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://netcompetitionblog.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Android’s Pickpocket Behind Google Wallet</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/09/androids-pickpocket-behind-google-wallet/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/09/androids-pickpocket-behind-google-wallet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The kerfuffle that paints the Google Wallet App as an innocent victim of Verizon blocking &#8212; in violation of an &#8220;open&#8221; Internet and net neutrality regulations &#8212; completely misses the forest for the trees. This conflict revolves around two ongoing industry battles. To see what this kerfuffle is really all about, read my Forbes Tech [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1538&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/09/androids-pickpocket-behind-google-wallet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon-Cable Spectrum: Is FCC Open to Frenemy Competition?</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/06/verizon-cable-spectrum-is-fcc-open-to-frenemy-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/06/verizon-cable-spectrum-is-fcc-open-to-frenemy-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Open Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The out-of-the-box thinking that led to Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Bright House to sell $3.6b of AWS spectrum to competitor Verizon, is a watershed &#8220;frenemy&#8221; competitive development which ultimately will flush out the real FCC. Please see my Forbes Tech Capitalist Post &#8220;Verizon-Cable Spectrum: Is FCC Open To Internet Frenemy Competition?&#8220; &#160; Filed under: [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1533&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/06/verizon-cable-spectrum-is-fcc-open-to-frenemy-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Flaws in FCC&#8217;s AT&amp;T / T-Mobile Competition Analysis</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/05/top-ten-flaws-in-fccs-att-t-mobile-competition-analysis/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/05/top-ten-flaws-in-fccs-att-t-mobile-competition-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wireless Spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netflix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unprecedented release of a FCC draft staff analysis opposing the proposed AT&#38;T / T-Mobile transaction could backfire legally, undermining its intent to backstop the DOJ&#8217;s pending lawsuit against the merger. See my Forbes Tech Capitalist post on the &#8220;Top Ten Flaws in the FCC&#8217;s AT&#38;T / T-Mobile Competition Analysis.&#8221;   Filed under: Antitrust, Competition, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1523&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/12/05/top-ten-flaws-in-fccs-att-t-mobile-competition-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobs&#8217; Apple Standard vs. Page&#8217;s Google Standard</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/10/12/jobs-apple-standard-vs-pages-google-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/10/12/jobs-apple-standard-vs-pages-google-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given that Apple and Google are the #1 and #2 most valuable brands in the world and that Google has invaded all of Apple’s markets in the last few years as a new competitor, it is illuminating and instructive to compare and contrast the radically different visions, values, and standards, of Apple’s former leader Steve [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1485&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/10/12/jobs-apple-standard-vs-pages-google-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google 21st Century Robber Baron</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/19/google-21st-century-robber-baron/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/19/google-21st-century-robber-baron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See my Forbes post &#8220;Google 21st Century Robber Baron&#8221; which briefly tells the story of Google&#8217;s Robber Baron rap sheet, in advance of Google&#8217;s Wednesday Senate antitrust hearing. The post is documented with 79 links to the supporting evidence. The post also explains why Google&#8217;s Board of Directors have been AWOL while all this scofflaw [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1448&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/19/google-21st-century-robber-baron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Satirical Preview of Google&#8217;s Senate Antitrust Testimony &#8212; Google&#8217;s Pinocchio Defense Part X</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/13/satirical-preview-of-googles-senate-antitrust-testimony-googles-pinocchio-defense-part-x/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/13/satirical-preview-of-googles-senate-antitrust-testimony-googles-pinocchio-defense-part-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member, it is a real pleasure to be here today, and thank you again for not issuing that formal subpoena you had to threaten in order to compel us to testify. Let me begin my testimony by taking this opportunity to divert the media’s attention from this hearing by making a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1435&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/13/satirical-preview-of-googles-senate-antitrust-testimony-googles-pinocchio-defense-part-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Ten Flaws in DOJ&#8217;s Case Against AT&amp;T &#8211; T-Mobile</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/01/top-ten-flaws-in-dojs-case-against-att-t-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/01/top-ten-flaws-in-dojs-case-against-att-t-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DOJ lawsuit against the AT&#38;T &#8211; T-Mobile merger has many serious flaws that will make it difficult for the DOJ to meet its burden of proof in court that this merger is anti-competitive. Court cases are precedent, fact, and merit driven, and DOJ&#8217;s case is much weaker in those critical dimensions than most appreciate [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1367&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/09/01/top-ten-flaws-in-dojs-case-against-att-t-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&amp;T / T-Mobile: Three Key Realities Why Merger Gets Approved</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/08/01/att-t-mobile-three-key-realities-why-merger-gets-approved/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/08/01/att-t-mobile-three-key-realities-why-merger-gets-approved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the end, the U.S. Government is highly-likely to approve the AT&#38;T/T-Mobile merger, despite the significant opposition, because of three over-riding realities: 1) market/financial realities, 2)DOJ legal/precedent realities, and 3) FCC public-interest realities. I.    Market Reality: T-Mobile&#8217;s leadership and owners have decided that they are unable and unwilling to invest what is necessary in [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1115&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/08/01/att-t-mobile-three-key-realities-why-merger-gets-approved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Rogue WiSpy Invasive Behavior Proliferates &#8212; Security is Google&#8217;s Achilles Heel &#8212; Part XIII</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/17/googles-rogue-wispy-invasive-behavior-proliferates-security-is-googles-achilles-heel-part-xiii/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/17/googles-rogue-wispy-invasive-behavior-proliferates-security-is-googles-achilles-heel-part-xiii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evidence continues to mount that Google&#8217;s management and supervision of its Android operating system is out-of-control when it comes to protecting privacy and security. Google&#8217;s corporate ethos that it is better to &#8220;ask for forgiveness than permission&#8221; increasingly means Android has no privacy by design and hence less security for users by default. Requiring and [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1083&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/17/googles-rogue-wispy-invasive-behavior-proliferates-security-is-googles-achilles-heel-part-xiii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rural Cellular’s Dilemma: Can’t Win the Future, Anchored to the Past</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/07/rural-cellular%e2%80%99s-dilemma-can%e2%80%99t-win-the-future-anchored-to-the-past/</link>
		<comments>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/07/rural-cellular%e2%80%99s-dilemma-can%e2%80%99t-win-the-future-anchored-to-the-past/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scleland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Spectrum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=1074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rural Cellular Association’s opposition to the AT&#38;T/T-Mobile acquisition puts a spotlight on the un-sustainability of the analog rural cellular model that is on the wrong side of broadband change. The clear but unspoken subtext of the RCA’s opposition is their recognition that their current subsidized model of rural cellular providers is fundamentally ill-equipped for [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=netcompetitionblog.org&amp;blog=7434138&amp;post=1074&amp;subd=netcompetition&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2011/06/07/rural-cellular%e2%80%99s-dilemma-can%e2%80%99t-win-the-future-anchored-to-the-past/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/56ea3445f7a55b5ae7f2796a7ab4d3bc?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F1.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">scleland</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
