<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why/how did Google outbid Apple for AdMob? Schmidt: Google Apple not &#8220;primary competitors&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netcompetitionblog.org/2009/12/14/whyhow-did-google-outbid-apple-for-admob-schmidt-google-apple-not-primary-competitors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2009/12/14/whyhow-did-google-outbid-apple-for-admob-schmidt-google-apple-not-primary-competitors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 03:36:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sammy braswell</title>
		<link>http://netcompetitionblog.org/2009/12/14/whyhow-did-google-outbid-apple-for-admob-schmidt-google-apple-not-primary-competitors/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sammy braswell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 20:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcompetitionblog.org/?p=460#comment-228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the ftc also needs to take a look at the on2 technologies merger with google that is still pending.  the reason i say this is because of this.    on2 technology is a video enabler technology company.   any company google or otherwise will have an unfair technology advantage over everyone else in the world of video.  on2 has stated at q reports for over 2  yeard that on average they sign 50 deals a q with 10 major deal a q on average.  most of these deals are covered by nondisclosure restrictions in them.  but there should be well over 80 major customers using on2 technology that will be at the mercy of anyone who buys them.      disclosure:  i am an investor in on2]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the ftc also needs to take a look at the on2 technologies merger with google that is still pending.  the reason i say this is because of this.    on2 technology is a video enabler technology company.   any company google or otherwise will have an unfair technology advantage over everyone else in the world of video.  on2 has stated at q reports for over 2  yeard that on average they sign 50 deals a q with 10 major deal a q on average.  most of these deals are covered by nondisclosure restrictions in them.  but there should be well over 80 major customers using on2 technology that will be at the mercy of anyone who buys them.      disclosure:  i am an investor in on2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

